larvalbug bytes archives / Main Index / previous / next

July, 2015

The Statins Solution?

by Larry

This past week I learned as many as 40% of adults in a broad age range in this country might profit from being on statin drugs to reduce their risks of heart attacks and stroke. Currently only about one in four who could benefit are taking such meds. The recommendation is not without controversy, but was surprising enough that I looked into the situation a bit more. First I went to a web site where one can readily (though maybe not accurately) calculate if one needs to be on statins to lower his or her chances of getting stroke or heart attack in the coming ten year period. It indicated I am definitely in the need to take statins population, a revelation given that I am at the lowest weight I have had since college, do not smoke, have low to moderate blood pressure, lack any known serious diseases, and had a relatively good result from blood testing a few months ago. In thinking about my risks I forgot one basic factor against me, my age.

Anyway, since this dubious beginning, have done a little more research and here is what I have discovered:


Illustration of statin binding to reduce blood cholesterol (Wikipedia)
So, this may for most of us be a topic for discussion with our physicians and warrant further investigation to help us choose whether or not taking statins seems the right choice.

It was stressed in the literature I have read that statins ought not be a substitute for a healthy lifestyle. Nonetheless, if one does what is recommended in that respect and still has a higher risk of stroke or heart attack, some type of daily statins pill might be appropriate.

For myself, I used to have high cholesterol before getting onto a frequent program of exercise and before losing some weight. In the interim, before the weight loss, I took an over the counter daily supplement, Red Yeast Rice, coupled with an enzyme supplement, CoQ10, and by the next annual physical was told by my internal medicine doctor the cholesterol level was now in the healthy range with no noticeable ill effects and to keep doing what I was doing to keep it there. I have no idea if this approach will work well for others, but for those concerned about higher than optimum blood fat levels it may be one option.

What, though, are some common side-effects that may be of concern when taking statins? They include: mild to moderate muscle pain or weakness, liver damage, memory loss, mood disorders, kidney failure, tiring easily, digestive problems, increased risk or aggravation of diabetes, weight gain (often due to a false sense of assurance one can eat as desired without ill effects plus due to muscle loss and weakness, leading to less enthusiasm for regular exercise), etc. Thus, one's decision about whether or not to use statins to reduce certain risks cannot be made lightly, in view of at least a small potential for such additional problems that could result from their use.

In my case, I think I shall tentatively consider resuming taking Red Yeast Rice with CoQ10, yet will also discuss it with my doctor and see if there may be further, more natural means of reducing my overall heart disease and stroke risks.

Hopefully, leading a healthy sort of lifestyle will in and of itself prove of sufficient benefit so that nothing more needs now to be done. Good luck to each of you in your own choices about your good health!

Primary source:

When to Start Taking a Cholesterol Pill? The Decision Is Yours. Harlan Krumholz in NPR; 7/15/15.


larvalbug bytes archives / Main Index / previous / next